Wednesday, November 19, 2008
250 response Module III
Between my rough draft and my final draft I made several changes, take for example the inclusion of a new paragraph entailing my own personal experiences with the subject of wisdom. I felt this was important because in a summary you should not only paraphrase the item which you read but also include your own feedback to better explain the article. Also by relating the subject to my own life shows that I have an understanding of what I read. At several points in the essay I added more examples such as the references to Joseph Stalin and Hitler when referring to intelligent individuals holding bad purpose. I also added a short piece about Anne Frank explaining how wisdom may have developed so quickly in the thirteen year old girl. I did this because examples help with clarity, you can directly define something, but relating it to a real life example really brings the definition together. In the rough draft I failed to draw connections between the 3 articles, so I tried to do so by adding sentences which connected the articles. I also changed the conclusion to sum up what all the articles mean in one paragraph allowing the connections to become more evident. When writing the rough draft I couldn’t seem the piece together a conclusion, though I feel the one I created for the final draft completes the task appropriately. Also looking back at the article after several days of my final draft I feel I could’ve made more changes, perhaps a second draft before the final would have been more appropriate for me. It’s a good representation of how nothing is ever perfect, there are always changes that can be made.
Rough Draft, whoops forgot to post :/
Wisdom
“The quality or state of being wise; knowledge of what is true or right coupled with just judgment as to action; sagacity, discernment, or insight,” as defined by Dictionary.com Unabridged. Wisdom is something which is developed over time in most people and is usually not evident till the later stages of one’s life. One is to question how does this develop, what conditions facilitate the development of wisdom, which conditions do not?
Professor Thao N. Le, of Colorado State University, believes there are two main things which provide means to developing wisdom, cultural values and life experiences. His study particularly, “…explores and extends the discussion of life crises on wisdom, specifically, the extent to which different life crises are related to wisdom, and are moderated by values for older adults” (Le 260). Le believes there are two types of wisdom, practical, which entails knowledge and understanding about human nature, and the ability to provide judgment and solve complex human problems, and transcendent, which entails knowledge, insight, and understanding about existential dilemmas and the nature of being. Practical tends to results in historical, interpretive kinds of knowledge, whereas transcendent wisdom reflects emancipator interests. The types of life experiences to be examined are those which are considered stressful or negative, and positive life experiences. Professor Thao Le conducted a study which one hundred ninety-nine participants, half European and half Vietnamese American, took part in one and half hour interview assessing their wisdom and values. When referring to values Le pays particular attention to two factors, openness to change and self-enhancement, and conservation value, values centered toward security and safety needs. The study provided evidence showed that the stressful experiences which people face throughout life may have negative effects, but also facilitate a positive effect on wisdom. It also showed a correlation between stressful experiences and development of wisdom. These resulted in the two different types of values mentioned above. Dependence of which type of value is created is on what types of experiences are faced, macro social/war, family, health, etc.
The next article to be explored is one by Professor Robert Sternberg titled, “What is wisdom and how can we develop it?” In this article he defines wisdom and explains a new idea on how to promote its development. Sternberg explains that wisdom is not something necessarily connected to intelligence and even states that intelligence often comes with qualities such as egocentrism, omniscience, omnipotence, and invulnerability. Intelligence with such things can evolve into using ones knowledge for bad purpose. While knowledge integrated with wisdom, or even wisdom on its own provides actions for the common good. Professor Sternberg believes that wisdom is the ability to use this intelligence and experience to appropriately balance, intrapersonal, interpersonal, and extrapersonal interests over short and long term periods of time and facilitate “adaptation to existing environments, shaping of existing environments, and selection of new environments” (Sternberg 165). Sternberg then continues to provide a plan to integrate the teaching of wisdom into primary schools in order for individuals to be taught this concept at a young age. Doing so would teach students to balance their life, and make better decisions, thus allowing students to develop somewhat of an artificial wisdom whereas they don’t need to face such negative experiences to develop their wisdom.
Doctor Paul Wong proposes his own definition of wisdom, “Wisdom may be defined as a special gift or ability to see clearly, discern correctly, understand deeply, and judge appropriately. It is based on the humility and openness to listen and learn from unlikely sources, including the mouth of a child and the whisper of a dying man. It involves the courage to be true to oneself, to do what is right and to achieve maximum good in spite of situational constraints and personal dangers. As a spiritual gift, it is to be received with humility and gratitude; as a human ability, cultivated with diligence; and as a character of authenticity and courage, practiced consistently.” Dr. Wong feels there are 3 different examples to which wisdom is acquired, the first entails grasping of the concept with little to none help; usually common in rare cases with intelligent individuals. The next is acquired through mentors or teachers who instill their wisdom on one, and the last is defined as “learning things the hard way,” through trial and error, and negative experiences. Wisdom is often spiritual and taught traditionally through religious books, such as the Koran, Bible, and books of proverbs. Dr. Wong also provides two lists, one which provides profiles of people who are wise and another which provides portraits of intellectual fools, those who are smart but not wise. He also makes the point that it is much easier to find “fools’ paradise” than it is to find wisdom, but often the pursuance of wisdom keeps you away from the wrong path. Dr. Wong holds a common phrase which he passes to all his patients, “wisdom is the touchstone of character rather than intellect.”
Need a conclusion……
“The quality or state of being wise; knowledge of what is true or right coupled with just judgment as to action; sagacity, discernment, or insight,” as defined by Dictionary.com Unabridged. Wisdom is something which is developed over time in most people and is usually not evident till the later stages of one’s life. One is to question how does this develop, what conditions facilitate the development of wisdom, which conditions do not?
Professor Thao N. Le, of Colorado State University, believes there are two main things which provide means to developing wisdom, cultural values and life experiences. His study particularly, “…explores and extends the discussion of life crises on wisdom, specifically, the extent to which different life crises are related to wisdom, and are moderated by values for older adults” (Le 260). Le believes there are two types of wisdom, practical, which entails knowledge and understanding about human nature, and the ability to provide judgment and solve complex human problems, and transcendent, which entails knowledge, insight, and understanding about existential dilemmas and the nature of being. Practical tends to results in historical, interpretive kinds of knowledge, whereas transcendent wisdom reflects emancipator interests. The types of life experiences to be examined are those which are considered stressful or negative, and positive life experiences. Professor Thao Le conducted a study which one hundred ninety-nine participants, half European and half Vietnamese American, took part in one and half hour interview assessing their wisdom and values. When referring to values Le pays particular attention to two factors, openness to change and self-enhancement, and conservation value, values centered toward security and safety needs. The study provided evidence showed that the stressful experiences which people face throughout life may have negative effects, but also facilitate a positive effect on wisdom. It also showed a correlation between stressful experiences and development of wisdom. These resulted in the two different types of values mentioned above. Dependence of which type of value is created is on what types of experiences are faced, macro social/war, family, health, etc.
The next article to be explored is one by Professor Robert Sternberg titled, “What is wisdom and how can we develop it?” In this article he defines wisdom and explains a new idea on how to promote its development. Sternberg explains that wisdom is not something necessarily connected to intelligence and even states that intelligence often comes with qualities such as egocentrism, omniscience, omnipotence, and invulnerability. Intelligence with such things can evolve into using ones knowledge for bad purpose. While knowledge integrated with wisdom, or even wisdom on its own provides actions for the common good. Professor Sternberg believes that wisdom is the ability to use this intelligence and experience to appropriately balance, intrapersonal, interpersonal, and extrapersonal interests over short and long term periods of time and facilitate “adaptation to existing environments, shaping of existing environments, and selection of new environments” (Sternberg 165). Sternberg then continues to provide a plan to integrate the teaching of wisdom into primary schools in order for individuals to be taught this concept at a young age. Doing so would teach students to balance their life, and make better decisions, thus allowing students to develop somewhat of an artificial wisdom whereas they don’t need to face such negative experiences to develop their wisdom.
Doctor Paul Wong proposes his own definition of wisdom, “Wisdom may be defined as a special gift or ability to see clearly, discern correctly, understand deeply, and judge appropriately. It is based on the humility and openness to listen and learn from unlikely sources, including the mouth of a child and the whisper of a dying man. It involves the courage to be true to oneself, to do what is right and to achieve maximum good in spite of situational constraints and personal dangers. As a spiritual gift, it is to be received with humility and gratitude; as a human ability, cultivated with diligence; and as a character of authenticity and courage, practiced consistently.” Dr. Wong feels there are 3 different examples to which wisdom is acquired, the first entails grasping of the concept with little to none help; usually common in rare cases with intelligent individuals. The next is acquired through mentors or teachers who instill their wisdom on one, and the last is defined as “learning things the hard way,” through trial and error, and negative experiences. Wisdom is often spiritual and taught traditionally through religious books, such as the Koran, Bible, and books of proverbs. Dr. Wong also provides two lists, one which provides profiles of people who are wise and another which provides portraits of intellectual fools, those who are smart but not wise. He also makes the point that it is much easier to find “fools’ paradise” than it is to find wisdom, but often the pursuance of wisdom keeps you away from the wrong path. Dr. Wong holds a common phrase which he passes to all his patients, “wisdom is the touchstone of character rather than intellect.”
Need a conclusion……
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)